Not Zero: How an Irrational Target Will Impoverish You, Help China (and Won't Even Save the Planet)

Product Information

Agriculture and land use have the weakest policies in the CCC’s assessment, despite being vital to delivering Net Zero and the Government’s other goals on food security and biodiversity. The Insights team generates long-form journalism and is working with academics from different backgrounds who have been engaged in projects to tackle societal and scientific challenges.

The impact of climate change hit home for the British public this summer with temperatures rising to 40.The term “net zero” is used by the world’s biggest polluters and governments as a façade to evade responsibility and disguise their inaction or harmful action on climate change. The UK governments seemingly unique decision to make net zero by 2050 a legal target has increasingly looked like folly to me for a while and this book confirms the worst fears of this. However, policymakers and businesses appear to be entirely serious about deploying highly speculative technologies as a way to land our civilisation at a sustainable destination. Most academics feel distinctly uncomfortable stepping over the invisible line that separates their day job from wider social and political concerns. Worse still, the inclusion of “net” in climate pledges confirms that emissions will not actually decline to zero.

This approach can also help to guarantee food and nutrition security and sovereignty, and conserve biodiversity. Los audiolibros del catálogo ilimitado que hayas añadido a tu biblioteca dejarán de estar disponibles cuando finalice tu suscripción, mientras que los audiolibros que hayas comprado son tuyos para siempre y podrás escucharlos incluso después de haber cancelado.However, the CCRM calculates that, taken together, the net zero pledges of the 24 corporations amount to a measly 36% by mid-century.

The only way to keep humanity safe is the immediate and sustained radical cuts to greenhouse gas emissions in a socially just way. Many governments and corporations have pledged to achieve “net zero” by a distant date, further compounding the harm caused. C, the number of lives lost to more intense storms, fires, heatwaves, famines and floods would significantly increase. Distribuimos y producimos contenido digital de información y entretenimiento y tenemos una gran selección de audiolibros, podcasts y series originales. Making long-term net-zero pledges enables governments and businesses to avoid drastic emissions cuts now.For example, if tha does owt for nowt do it for thysen: if you do something for nothing do it for yourself. Against all expectations, after decades of false starts and failures, the international community had finally agreed to do what it took to limit global warming to well below 2°C, preferably to 1.