They should not be made to feel that their pregnancy loss is a common medicalcondition, regardless of how far along they were. Miscarriage is different for everyone. Let's respect that. Let's offer sympathy and support. I’ll always wonder what we could have been. I’ll wonder if you could have been the one to make me fall in love again. I’ll always wonder if you’d be the one to help me complete the endless list of projects and ideas I have churning in my head. I’ll always wonder if you’d be the one who could make me appreciate how sentimental and important love is. My husband and I were so excited about this baby. It was our first child together (I had a daughter from a previous marriage) and he really wanted kids. He asked me on the first date multiple times if I wanted kids! And I was excited to finally give my then 5-year-old a sibling and to have a child with the man I loved.

We are one year on and unfortunately are two further losses along. One of which included a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Resulting in The loss of one ofmy Fallopian tubes as well as the pregnancy. Bringing into focus not only loss and grief but also my own mortality, as well as uncertainty regarding myfuture ability to conceive. I pray no one ever has to experience a crisis pregnancy like I did, but I know someone else will, and until you do, you’ll never know the depth of the hurt and pain. Having to make unfathomable choices is the most heart-wrenching thing that can happen to a mother. So my grief leaves me in this place where I struggle between the gratitude I feel for my own life and the deep loss of our daughter.

Our whole world stopped as doctors saved my life, my body fought, and we said goodbye to our beloved daughter. 

I wanted to write this as a tribute to the child that I lost. He existed. He was real. He is not something to hide or to be ashamed of. He was mine. And he had a name. Gummy. For the life of me, I couldn’t fathom why God would make this a part of our story —we aren’t strangers to hard, but this was beyond any comprehension. Belnap, N., Perloff, M., & Xu, M. (2001). Facing the future: Agents and choices in our indeterminist world. Oxford University Press. Thomason, R. H. (1984). Combinations of tense and modality. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic: Extensions of classical logic (Vol. II, pp. 135–165). Springer. My doctor’s phone lay on my chest playing “Rescue” by Lauren Daigle as I faded off to sleep. I can’t even begin to recount how well we were cared for by my medical team and the love we felt there. Our whole world stopped as doctors saved my life, my body fought, and we said goodbye to our beloved daughter. RELATED: God Actually Does Give Us More Than We Can Handle

A wave of grief and sadness hit me, my heart ached, it was gone, I would never meetthat little person I had been planning for these last 11 weeks. I would never hold them, smell their baby newness, I wouldnever know if they were a boy or girl, I would never get to see how their big sisters would be with their new sibling. We madeour way to the maternity hospital, we were put in a waiting room with other mothers to be waiting for scans.I will always wonder, who you would, have been, child baby loss, memorial quote, svg cut files, in memory children, sympathy heaven, brother family son, sister daughter, goodbyes miscarriage, religious angel, sorrow remembrance

Schoubye, A. J., & Rabern, B. (2017). Against the Russellian open future. Mind, 126(504), 1217–1237.

I usually don’t answer, because I assume the one posting the question is looking for guidance from someone older and wiser who can tell her how to know she should prevent further pregnancies, and I don’t have the answer to that. Plus, those are two different questions.

But writing is therapy for me. And this year, I feel ready to share a part of my life journey that almost destroyed me. Note how we would model Susan’s initial wondering whether Larry is bald. It involves wondering which of the possible, complete answers: ‘Larry is bald’ is true, ‘Larry is bald’ is middle, ‘Larry is bald’ is false is the correct answer to L. And once Susan learns that ‘Larry is bald’ is middle, her inquiry comes to an end. But this model cannot be applied in the case of wondering about future contingents since, once one accepts Middlism for future contingents, (NA24) is true and (NA24) is false are ruled out as possible answers to N. Just as coming to know that ‘Larry is bald’ is middle makes it inappropriate for Susan to continue to wonder whether L, coming to know that (NA24) is middle seems to make it inappropriate to continue to wonder whether N. Of course it is open to the Middlist to claim that wondering about future contingents is wholly different than wondering about vague propositions, but considering the case of vagueness suggests that wondering whether in cases of indeterminacy is plausibly understood as wondering what truth-value a given proposition has, and learning the truth-value renders further wondering inappropriate. The Middlist who insists that wondering about future contingents is appropriate would need to give this up: knowing what truth-value a proposition, p, has is compatible with wondering whether p. It is worth noting the oddity in accepting this. For a Middlist to wonder whether it will rain tomorrow is not for her to wonder whether it is true that it will rain tomorrow. She knows that it is not true that it will rain tomorrow, yet she wonders whether it will rain. Footnote 33 An utterance of ‘I know that it is not true that it will rain tomorrow and I wonder whether it will’ certainly sounds defective, but should be assertable if knowing what truth-value a future contingent has is compatible with wondering about it. Furthermore, Middlists shouldn’t hesitate to accept a bet that it is not true that it will rain tomorrow (and shouldn’t hesitate to accept a bet that it is not false that it will). One might have thought that introducing an intermediate truth-value provides a way of modelling our ignorance of future contingents, but once we recognize that ignorance and wondering are plausibly understood as ignorance and wondering about what truth-value a proposition has, we realise that introducing an intermediate truth-value undermines, rather than vindicates, our wondering about future contingents. 4.3 SupervaluationismConsider the case in which I wonder on Monday whether the sodium-24 atom will decay in the next 24 h. The suggestion is that (WIN1*) is compatible with the appropriateness of my wondering because I fail to know the true, complete answer-at-Tuesday to the question of whether the sodium-24 atom decays. Enter guilt, my thoughts in response to these words: "What is wrong with me? Why am I upset when it was early and other women are obviously able to get over it without much fuss. " F \(\upvarphi\) is true at m iff for every h that contains m, F \(\upvarphi\) is satisfied at m in h.