As of yesterday I started an editing session with some new 60fps ProRes 422 1080p footage - and ran into the 'speed up faster than 60fps, and then freeze/pause to 'catch up', repeatedly every second or so throughout the clips. Mo.Est. Type: This parameter allows you to choose the method DaVinci Resolve uses to analyze the image and detect motion. The available options include Faster, Better, and None. The default setting, Faster, is less processor-intensive but may be less accurate. The Better option provides greater accuracy but demands more processing power. None disables motion analysis altogether, which can be useful when there is no motion in the scene. The default option is Better. They wouldn't even need that. If it's 23.976 fps footage that's been converted to 29.97 fps, then there's going to be six duplicate frames per second and they would be in the same pattern. Resolve would just need to grab one second of the clip, and subtract each frame from it's previous frame and mark the six frames with the lowest differences as duplicates to determine a pattern. Then they'd just need to continue that pattern throughout the clip.

Issue: Tried different footage from different cameras, all recorded at 59.94. All of them run choppy at DR (either the source monitor, or timeline) but it runs perfect on any media player, or even in Adobe Premiere Pro. In Resolve, you can try using the Resolve FX Revival Frame Replacer FX Effect to replace the missing frames. It can do a pretty good job, depending on the source material and how bad the missing frames issue is. The laptop is optimized for performance, and it’s always used with cable current I disabled all the power saving modes.

Fairlight Console Mounting Bar 5 Bay

If you're working with cell phone footage, the best course is transcoding it at the outset to a codec better suited to editing. When you say they play normally outside of Resolve, what does that mean? With the BRAW Player app? If so, when it encounters dropped frames, it will freeze on the last good frame, and unfreeze on the next good frame, masking the dropped frames. You can verify this by finding an offline frame in Resolve, and then single frame stepping through that same area in the BRAW Player app. You'll see that it's freezing around the missing frame.

Gang Luma Chroma: This parameter determines whether the Luma and Chroma Threshold sliders are linked together. For typical 23.98 to 29.97 conversions of a discrete clip, that would be true. But you should see the kinds of garbage masters that the agency's client will sometimes provide to me that was made by other post vendors. These are typically edited masters that have been edited with the same type of badly converted footage, so there is no predictable cadence to the repeated frames. It requires a full, frame by frame analysis of the entire clip to even begin to remove them. I'd futzed with the video cards (2 eGPUs running on the TB3 ports + the 8G version of the internal card...); and so I returned the settings to 'auto' as before. Note: Resolve, Neat, and other apps have mixed success with the eGPUs, but I did not bother to remove them (yet)PleaseSupportProResRAW wrote:I apologize for the silly question, but for my sanity I have to ask: you're seeing a green 119.88 indicator in the upper left corner of your source monitor as you preview your video? Needles to say, but I will anyway, that I tried also rendering the lowest quality of optimized media, and quarter of a proxy (wich it should run super smooth with my laptop specs, but again, not at 59.940) I have to insist that this only happens in Da Vinci Resolve, and ONLY happens with the 59.940 resolution. If it helps, I noticed it happens the most in PANS OR TILTS. As others play that file ok its sounds like a system setup you have but we need the facts to avoid 10 guesses. Import the newly filtered image sequence as a new clip in Resolve, then render it out to a video file.