The New York Times, April 15, 1957, Screen: '12 Angry Men'; Jury Room Drama Has Debut at Capitol review by A. LARB publishes daily without a paywall as part of our mission to make rigorous, incisive, and engaging writing on every aspect of literature, culture, and the arts freely accessible to the public.

Entonces, de algún modo, puede ser de interés sociológico, filosófico, jurídico, educativo y personal. Professor of Law Emeritus at UCLA School of Law Michael Asimow referred to the film as a "tribute to a common man holding out against lynch mob mentality".If you’re interested in how the film adaptation starring Henry Fonda compares, check out my friend Chelsea’s review HERE!

Pero es en ese espacio y mensaje de esperanza y de apertura al diálogo, a la duda y a involucrarse conscientemente en el valor de las consecuencias de nuestras acciones, donde, al menos yo, encontré la inclinación final de esta valoración. His realistic approach helped create the slice of life school of television drama, which was particularly influential in the anthology programs of the 1950s.Eleven jurors are ready to make a snap decision of guilty and head home, but one dissenting juror has a reasonable doubt.

I'm not particularly PC or easily offended by inappropriate laughter, but the laughter jarred me badly.These sections are less satisfactory, maybe just less necessary to most of us, than the history-telling.